AI Humanizer
We remove the AI tells from your draft. We do not bypass detectors.
Most humanizers hand you new text and a promise about some detector. This one shows its work: every AI writing pattern it found, where it found it, and what changed. Your facts, numbers and argument stay put.
Single · free · 1 a day — Council and Deep on any paid plan
This usually takes about 5 seconds.
Deep takes a minute or two: four pro models answer, two critics review, one mediator writes the final call. This page updates when it lands.
Every free tool here runs one model. Pro runs four.
A single model agrees with itself. Multi-model consensus puts four of them on the same draft and shows you where they disagree, which is where the errors live. That runs on Pro. Leave your email and we'll send you the walkthrough, no account needed.
One email, no spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Done. Check your inbox.
The multi-model walkthrough is on its way.
You've used your free analysis for today. Sign up for TrueStandard to get unlimited access with 4 AI models instead of 1.
Or come back tomorrow for another free analysis.
Want the score before the edit? Run it as the AI Slop Detector
What counts as an AI tell?
AI writing has a fingerprint. Not a vibe, a fingerprint: specific words, specific sentence shapes, specific structural habits that show up far more often in generated text than in writing a person actually typed.
We scan your draft against 24 documented patterns
Banned vocabulary like delve, leverage, robust and tapestry. Dead phrases like it's worth noting. Structural tells like the rule of three, throat-clearing openers, and endings that restate the whole piece. You get a score out of 100 before anything is rewritten.
We check the prose mechanics too
Passive voice that hides who acted. Adverbs propping up weak verbs. Sentences carrying three ideas and two commas. Reading grade. These are separate from AI tells, so you get a separate score for them.
We edit, then re-run both checks
The editor gets the exact list of faults, not a vague instruction to sound human. Then the same scanner runs again on the result, so you see the before and after side by side rather than taking our word for it.
The pattern catalogue comes from Wikipedia's Signs of AI Writing guide, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup, combined with nine rules of prose mechanics. Both run as deterministic checks, so the same text always gets the same score.
Cleaning up how it reads is one problem. Knowing whether it's actually true is the other one.
Before and after
In today's world, the landscape of creator monetization is undergoing a transformative shift. It's worth noting that many creators are now leveraging multiple revenue streams to foster sustainable growth. Here's the thing. Most creators delve into paid tiers far too early. The reality is that a seamless upgrade path takes 6 to 12 months to build properly. And that matters.
Creator monetization is changing. Many creators now run several revenue streams at once to keep growing. Most of them open paid tiers too early, before the free list can carry a paid offer. Building an upgrade path people actually take runs about nine months.
Frequently Asked Questions
A tool that rewrites machine-sounding text so it reads like a person wrote it. This one works on your own draft: it finds the patterns that make writing read as generated, then edits them out while keeping your meaning, your facts and your structure.
We don't promise that, and you should be careful with any tool that does. AI detectors disagree with each other, change without notice, and produce false positives on writing no machine touched. What we can show you is a deterministic score: which patterns your draft contains and whether they're still there after editing. That number is reproducible. A detector's verdict this week is not.
No. Editing your own draft doesn't create plagiarism, so a plagiarism check would be answering a question you didn't ask. We do check that the edit stayed close to your original length and kept every number you wrote, which is what stops an editor from quietly inventing things.
It's instructed not to, and we verify. After every edit we compare the numbers in your draft against the numbers in the result and flag any that went missing. Names, dates, quotes and links are meant to survive untouched. Read the result before you publish it.
One draft a day, up to about 300 words. Signed-in accounts run it against their credits with no daily cap.
Two numbers. AI tells measures documented generated-writing patterns per 100 words. Prose tightness measures mechanics: passive voice, adverbs, overlong sentences, reading grade. Clean human writing usually scores above 90 on the first. Unedited AI drafts often land under 40.
Powered by TrueStandard
Multi-model AI verification for high-stakes decisions.