TrueStandard TrueStandard
A · Filed without a trail

Your editor asks how you checked it. Two dozen claims drafted with AI and no record of which ones you verified, or how.

B · Filed with a receipt

Every claim labeled and timestamped. Three challenged, two partial, the rest verified — and a report you can hand to the desk.

One filed story. Your byline. No trail behind it.
FOR JOURNALISTS

No Fact-Checking Desk. No Problem.

You don't have a newsroom fact-checking team. But you still need the rigor. TrueStandard checks every claim in your story with four independent AI models before you file.

March 2026: Ars Technica reporter fired for publishing AI-hallucinated quotes. — Hacker News, 800+ comments

See How It Works

01 The Freelance Journalist's AI Problem

FABRICATED SOURCES

47% of ChatGPT-generated citations are inaccurate or fabricated

AI invents quotes, cites papers that don't exist, and attributes findings to real institutions that never published them.

ONE MISTAKE, CAREER OVER

Reporter fired. $5,000 court fines. Public embarrassment.

The Ars Technica firing. The lawyer sanctions. You publish under your name. One fabricated quote is all it takes.

NO SAFETY NET

No fact-checker, no editor, no research assistant

You're one person with a deadline. Checking a piece by hand eats the better part of an hour. AI was supposed to make you faster.

02 See What TrueStandard Catches Before You File

A health newsletter draft with wrong claims. The same patterns appear in journalism.

01
Draft
written with AI
02
Paste
60 seconds, four models
Gate A
03
Split
where they disagree
04
Fix
ranked by damage
Gate B
05
Publish
with a receipt

Gate A · four labs, no self-grading Gate B · no claim ships unlabeled

Publishing is the last step, not the first risk.
Before · what you were about to send

New research confirms intermittent fasting reduces inflammation by 70%.

Challenged

It goes out to 50,000 subscribers. One reader checks the number. The screenshot outlives the issue.

After · what you send instead

Trials of intermittent fasting found a modest drop in some inflammation markers, such as CRP.

Verified

17 minutes of fixes. No correction email — and a report that shows exactly what you checked.

The same check flagged two more
CRITICAL

'Extend Lifespan by Up to 20 Years'

No human study supports this claim. The 10-15% lifespan extension it echoes comes from rodent work. Extrapolating that to '20 years' in humans is unsupported.

MODERATE

'A Harvard Study'

Multiple Harvard-affiliated studies on fasting exist with varying conclusions. No specific paper, authors, or year cited.

17 minutes of fixes prevents a correction email to 50,000 subscribers

Sample draft · 1,200 words · checked in 52 seconds

One claim, two outcomes. The difference is 52 seconds.

Without TrueStandard, the journalist publishes a sourced claim that doesn't check out. An expert reader catches it, tweets it, and the correction goes viral.

03 How TrueStandard Replaces a Fact-Checking Desk

CLAIM VERIFICATION

Every claim checked against evidence

Paste your story. Four AI models independently verify every statistic, quote, and sourced claim. You see where they agree and where they split.

CITATION CHECKING

Are your sources real?

TrueStandard flags citations that don't exist, sources that don't say what you claim, and quotes that look fabricated.

BLINDSPOT DETECTION

What you missed

Four models find gaps a single read wouldn't catch — missing context, unconsidered angles, claims that will age badly.

60-SECOND TURNAROUND

File on deadline, not after it

Sixty seconds instead of sixty minutes, with the same rigor.

04 File Stories with the Rigor of a Larger Newsroom

Four AI models. 60 seconds. Every claim, every citation, every quote — checked before it goes out under your byline.

See Pricing
No Training on Your Data · 60-Second Checks · Full Verification Reports

Also written for solo newsletter publishers, content teams.