Does My Writing Look AI-Generated?
Paste a draft and find out before your readers decide for you.
This does not guess at a probability. It names the documented AI writing patterns sitting in your draft, shows you the line each one is on, and hands back an edited version with them taken out. Your facts, numbers and argument stay put.
This usually takes about 5 seconds.
AI Humanizer runs the moment you sign in, on the text you just pasted. Nothing to enter twice.
A saved check is kept for 24 hours.
You've used up today's free runs on this check.
Come back tomorrow for another free run.
Want the score on its own? Run it as the AI Slop Detector
What counts as an AI tell?
AI writing has a fingerprint. Not a vibe, a fingerprint: specific words, specific sentence shapes, specific structural habits that show up far more often in generated text than in writing a person actually typed.
We scan your draft against 22 documented patterns
Banned vocabulary like delve, leverage, robust and tapestry. Dead phrases like it's worth noting. Structural tells like the rule of three, throat-clearing openers, and endings that restate the whole piece. You get a score out of 100 before anything is rewritten.
We check the prose mechanics too
Passive voice that hides who acted. Adverbs propping up weak verbs. Sentences carrying three ideas and two commas. Reading grade. These are separate from AI tells, so you get a separate score for them.
We edit, then re-run both checks
The editor gets the exact list of faults, not a vague instruction to sound human. Then the same scanner runs again on the result, so you see the before and after side by side rather than taking our word for it.
The pattern catalogue comes from Wikipedia's Signs of AI Writing guide, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup, combined with nine rules of prose mechanics. Both run as deterministic checks, so the same text always gets the same score.
Cleaning up how it reads is one problem. Knowing whether it's actually true is the other one.
Before and after
In today's world, the landscape of creator monetization is undergoing a transformative shift. It's worth noting that many creators are now leveraging multiple revenue streams to foster sustainable growth. Here's the thing. Most creators delve into paid tiers far too early. The reality is that a seamless upgrade path takes 6 to 12 months to build properly. And that matters.
Creator monetization is changing. Many creators now run several revenue streams at once to keep growing. Most of them open paid tiers too early, before the free list can carry a paid offer. Building an upgrade path people actually take runs about nine months.
Frequently Asked Questions
Read it for the patterns, not the vibe. Generated prose leans on a small set of habits: banned vocabulary like delve and leverage, throat-clearing openers, sentences of near-identical length, and endings that restate the piece. This check scores your draft against the documented catalogue and quotes the line each pattern sits on, so you can judge it yourself.
Because detectors measure how predictable your sentences are, and careful, plain writing is predictable. That penalises non-native speakers and anyone with a tidy style. It is one reason we score documented patterns instead: a pattern count is reproducible and you can see what produced it, while a detector's percentage changes between tools on the same paragraph.
Not for writing you did yourself. Claude's watermark attaches to word choices Claude made, so a draft it wrote carries the mark and a paragraph it merely proofread carries almost nothing. Detection also needs Anthropic's key, which no third-party tool has. It says nothing about how your writing reads, which is what this check measures.
Vocabulary is the loudest signal, then rhythm. Words like tapestry, robust, foster and crucial appear far more often in generated text. So do dead phrases like it is worth noting, the rule of three in every list, and paragraphs that all run to the same length. Readers rarely name these, but they register them as a flatness in the prose.
We do not promise that, and you should be careful with any tool that does. Detectors disagree with each other and change without notice. What you get here is a reproducible score: which documented patterns your draft contains, and whether they are still there after the edit. That number holds still. A detector's verdict this week does not.
Powered by TrueStandard
Four independent models check every claim in your draft.